This agency that targets Republicans while shielding Democrats must be dismantled

Elon Musk has claimed that 1 of the astir communal errors of a astute technologist is to optimize a happening that should not exist. But it doesn’t instrumentality a SpaceX-level technologist to recognize that the Office of Government Ethics – an bureau fewer Americans cognize by name, but whose unchecked powerfulness casts a agelong shadiness implicit our ideology – simply has nary intent successful its existent form. The OGE is simply a partisan, bureaucratic thicket that should beryllium afloat dismantled. It selectively enforces hazy rules astir the fiscal arrangements of incoming candidates and officials – often successful a heavy-handed mode against Republicans. Commonly, the 2 winners successful a conflict with OGE are (1) Democrats and (2) lawyers. As a practicing lawyer successful the tract of governmental law, I person a first-hand look astatine this frequently-partisan conflict waged by OGE against nominees and candidates.

The taxpayer-funded monument to post-Watergate paranoia is simply a relic of a bygone era. On behalf of my clients, I person navigated its labyrinthine requirements for years, and I tin attest: OGE is not a guardian of integrity, but a sanctimonious bureaucratic machine, burdening nationalist servants with meaningless reddish portion portion undermining the volition of the electorate. It’s clip to dismantle this sham and reconstruct accountability wherever it belongs: with the voters.

Created successful 1978 amid the hysteria pursuing Watergate, OGE operates connected a flawed premise: that each nationalist authoritative is simply a latent crook, requiring changeless oversight by unelected mandarins. This presumption insults the quality of the American people, who are perfectly susceptible of judging their leaders astatine the ballot box. Ethics successful authorities is not preserved by faceless table jockeys wielding stacks of fiscal disclosure, recusal, and divestiture forms; it is enforced by citizens casting votes. Outsourcing this ineffable work to a bloated bureau similar OGE diminishes ideology itself while costing taxpayers much than $20 cardinal annually. 

DOGE SLASHES ‘WASTEFUL’ ‘PROBLEM-SOLVING’ CONTRACT WORTH $50K IN LATEST ROUND OF ELIMINATIONS

Even worse than the existent outgo to American taxpayers is the inherent taxation this imposes connected those looking to service their state successful the national government. OGE’s bureaucrats personally impact themselves successful a probing, uncomfortable, subjective introspection of the finances of astir anyone successful a mediate oregon elder presumption successful the national government, on with that person’s contiguous household members. They see themselves the prosecutor, judge, and assemblage for whether idiosyncratic who has had fiscal occurrence successful the existent satellite indispensable springiness it each distant successful bid to participate the government. What’s worse, OGE often changes its ain measurement standards, starring to constricted predictability arsenic to what a nominee tin support and what helium oregon she indispensable offload. As an lawyer who represents clients done this process, I instrumentality nary delight successful this outcome, but it results successful hours of needless enactment for lawyers and fiscal advisors, the costs of which indispensable often beryllium borne by the idiosyncratic seeking to serve.

Consider its applicable and nationalist failures. In caller months, OGE’s obsession with nitpicking fiscal disclosures delayed the confirmation of President Trump’s nominees during an already protracted transition. These reviews — often redundant and ever laborious — added nary discernible worth to the public’s knowing of nominees’ fitness, and cannot perchance beryllium successful the public’s interest. By inserting itself arsenic an unelected gatekeeper, OGE slows governance and frustrates the mandate of elections.

Worse, OGE has go a limb of partisan warfare, selectively enforcing its vague standards to people Republicans portion giving Democrats a escaped pass. Take the lawsuit of Biden’s Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, who held millions successful banal successful an electrical autobus shaper championed by the administration. In 2021, President Biden visited the company, praising it arsenic a cornerstone of America’s greenish future. The institution aboriginal went bankrupt, but not earlier the caput cashed retired with $1.6 cardinal successful superior gains aft Biden’s visit. 

OGE’s response? Silence. Contrast this with the agency’s relentless hounding of Trump’s HHS Secretary Tom Price successful 2017 implicit backstage pitchy travel, fueling a media firestorm that yet led to his resignation. The signifier is clear: OGE plays favorites, acting arsenic a blocker to make controversies for 1 broadside portion ignoring the other.

This treble modular extends to OGE’s handling of high-profile figures. When FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr contributed to the authorship of Project 2025, Democrats cried "conflict of interest." OGE dragged retired its review, allowing the Left to smear Trump’s docket unchecked, lone to wide Carr aft the harm was done, conscionable 2 weeks earlier the 2024 election. 

Compare this to Hunter Biden’s lucrative Burisma dealings during the Obama years — OGE didn’t utter a peep. Similarly, Biden’s Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack faced nary scrutiny for cozy backstage pitchy trips successful 2022, portion OGE amplified outrage implicit acold little egregious Republican travel. Such selective amnesia betrays OGE’s impartiality and exposes its relation arsenic a partisan cudgel of the heavy state.

The agency’s redundancy compounds its flaws. Every national section already has interior morals offices, rendering OGE’s $24 cardinal yearly fund a wasteful duplication. If an authoritative breaks the law, the Department of Justice tin prosecute.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

OGE’s sister agency, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), which polices Hatch Act violations, is chopped from the aforesaid cloth. In 2024, Biden’s fund manager Neera Tanden flirted with Hatch Act violations, fundraising brazenly connected X, portion FTC Chair Lina Khan appeared astatine Democratic run events, prompting a House Oversight inquiry. OSC’s response? Nothing. 

Yet successful 2017, it aggressively pursued Kellyanne Conway for a fleeting remark astir Ivanka Trump’s brand, demanding probes and decrying the "death of democracy." The hypocrisy is stark: Democrats skate, portion Trump’s allies look the guillotine.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

President Trump’s determination to occurrence OGE main David Huitema successful February 2025 was a bold measurement successful the close absorption toward dismantling this deep-state bureau with crosshairs connected Republicans. The public’s resounding reelection of Trump successful 2024 was a mandate to expanse distant specified bureaucratic obstructions, not a telephone for much oversight by unelected elites. Trump’s broader dismissal of 17 inspectors wide alongside Huitema sparked predictable outrage, but it underscored a truth: officials elected by the voters–not agencies–hold the powerfulness to punish misconduct.

Abolishing OGE would not permission morals unpoliced. Internal bureau offices, the Justice Department, and — astir crucially — the electorate supply ample checks. OGE’s beingness lone fuels conflict, delays the president’s medication from being filled with his chosen advisors, and erodes spot successful nationalist institutions, the precise other of its stated mission. It’s clip to extremity this bureaucratic charade. Let’s spot the American radical to clasp their leaders accountable, arsenic ideology demands.