Sarah Paulson slammed as ‘hypocritical’ after wearing dollar-bill mask to protest America’s top 1% at $100K Met Gala

1 week ago 10

Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC whitethorn gain committee oregon gross done links successful the contented below.

Sarah Paulson made a connection astir wealth and powerfulness astatine fashion's astir exclusive nighttime — but immoderate critics accidental the connection backfired.

The Emmy-winning histrion attended the 2026 Met Gala — the taxable this twelvemonth was "Costume Art" alongside a "Fashion is Art" formal codification — successful a melodramatic grey tulle shot gown, achromatic opera gloves, diamond jewelry and a dollar-bill blindfold stretched crossed her eyes.

When asked connected the reddish carpet to sanction her look, she replied: "the 1 percent" (1).

Top Picks

Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you tin present go a landlord for arsenic small arsenic $100 — and no, you don't person to woody with tenants oregon hole freezers. Here's how
Dave Ramsey warns astir 50% of Americans are making 1 large Social Security mistake — here’s however to hole it ASAP
The IRS usually taxes golden arsenic a collectible — but this little-known strategy lets you clasp carnal bullion tax-free. Get your escaped usher from Priority Gold

The look, designed by Matières Fécales, was called "The One Percent" Haute Couture, portion the disguise itself was dubbed "Blinded by Money." The decorator said the postulation reflected "the greed and corruption that comes with utmost power" (2).

But the mounting made the connection hard for immoderate observers to accept.

The Met Gala — an invite-only fundraiser for the Metropolitan Museum of Art's Costume Institute — reportedly carried a terms tag of $100,000 per summons (3). This year's lawsuit besides drew protests due to the fact that Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos served arsenic sponsors, reportedly making a $10 cardinal donation (4).

That backdrop rapidly fueled accusations that Paulson's protestation against the ultra-wealthy felt retired of place.

"This is the worst 1 astatine the Met Gala," erstwhile Levi's enforcement Jennifer Sey wrote connected X (5). "Sarah Paulson's dollar measure disguise is immoderate benignant of protestation against the 1% of which she is simply a part. If you privation to protestation the affluent don't spell to an lawsuit that costs $100k per ticket. And springiness your $12m nett worthy away."

Others made a akin point, arguing that Hollywood celebrities are portion of the elite they're criticizing. "Babe, you ARE the 1%," different idiosyncratic wrote (6). "This is the astir brain-d$ad, hypocritical personage stunt of the year."

The backlash besides dispersed to Reddit, wherever 1 viral station took purpose astatine the opposition betwixt Paulson's connection and the mounting (7). "It's truthful comic erstwhile celebs deliberation they're making immoderate expansive connection but extremity up conscionable looking painfully retired of touch," 1 idiosyncratic wrote.