Opinion - Ted Cruz and birthright citizenship: Be careful what you wish for

3 weeks ago 10

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) exulted erstwhile the U.S. Supreme Court precocious vacated respective little tribunal injunctions against President Trump’s executive order purporting to contradict birthright citizenship for the children of “illegal entrants.”

Within hours, helium posted a video declaring that “birthright citizenship is simply a argumentation that doesn’t marque immoderate sense,” adjacent though it is the archetypal condemnation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution: “All persons calved oregon naturalized successful the United States, and taxable to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”

Cruz has sponsored legislation to exclude disfavored children from the Constitution. Yet helium was calved successful Canada successful 1970, to an American parent and a Cuban émigré father. He has ne'er been naturalized.

Cruz’s ain citizenship derives not straight from the Constitution, but from Section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which applies to children calved extracurricular the U.S. to “parents 1 of whom is an alien, and the different a national of the United States.”

Because Cruz’s statutory citizenship arose astatine birth, helium was likely eligible for the presidency, when helium ran successful the 2016 Republican primary, arsenic a “natural calved citizen” under Article II. It besides means that helium was ne'er naturalized. He owes his citizenship to the method exertion of a notoriously analyzable statute.

Under the instrumentality in 1970, Cruz’s mother, Elizabeth Darragh, could convey citizenship to him only if she had been “physically present” successful the U.S. for 10 years earlier his birth, including astatine slightest 5 years aft the property of 14. (This instrumentality has since been somewhat liberalized.)

Although Cruz has produced his mother’s birth certificate, showing that she was calved successful Delaware successful 1934, that unsocial is insufficient to found the indispensable 10 years of “physical presence” successful the U.S., with astatine slightest 5 of those years betwixt 1948 and 1970.

A strict exertion of the instrumentality — of the benignant Cruz seeks to enforce connected others — would necessitate documentary grounds of Darragh’s qualifying beingness successful the U.S. anterior to Cruz’s Canadian birth.

If Trump’s enforcement bid oregon Cruz’s projected statute had been successful effect successful 1934, Darragh’s commencement certificate would not adjacent represent impervious of her ain citizenship, upon which Cruz’s citizenship depends. Rather, helium would person to found that 1 of Darragh’s parents had been a national oregon a imperishable nonmigratory alien.

There is besides immoderate crushed to wonderment whether Cruz’s begetter had erstwhile violated migration law. Raphael Cruz, Sr. came to the U.S. connected a pupil visa in 1957, astatine property 18, speaking astir nary English. Upon enrolling astatine the University of Texas, helium worked washing dishes for “a specified 50 cents an hour.”

As Cruz enactment it, “Since helium liked to devour 7 days a week, helium worked 7 days a week” to enactment himself done school, graduating with a chemic engineering grade successful 1961.

Rafael’s admirable enactment ethic whitethorn nevertheless person placed him “out of status.” In 1957, determination were significant employment restrictions on student visa holders, allowing them to enactment lone constricted hours with support from the territory manager of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, oregon “for applicable training” if “required oregon recommended by the institution.”

The minimum wage in 1957 was $1.00 an hour, which astatine slightest suggests that Rafael was moving disconnected the books, perchance for cash, which has ne'er been antithetic for recently arrived teenagers who talk nary English.

If so, determination would person been nary Immigration and Naturalization Service permission, nary paycheck withholding, nary societal information contributions and possibly nary income taxation payments, and consequently aggregate migration violations.

Rafael Cruz delayed becoming a U.S. national until 2005, erstwhile Ted was already solicitor wide of Texas. The required forms would person included his employment and immigration history, including whether helium had ever been retired of status. There is nary mode to cognize whether Rafael Cruz disclosed his perchance unauthorized employment.

That is simply a seemingly tiny matter, but it mightiness beryllium capable to get idiosyncratic deported successful a authorities tally by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

I don’t mean to disparage the Cruz family, oregon to situation the senator’s citizenship, but alternatively to amusement what happens erstwhile anyone’s migration presumption is intensely questioned.

Statutes, and particularly enforcement orders, tin beryllium fickle and unreliable, taxable to misinterpretation, amendment, withdrawal oregon repeal.

Future children successful Cruz’s concern — calved overseas to lone 1 American parent, with different who whitethorn person violated migration laws — mightiness oregon mightiness not go statutory citizens, depending connected the winds of nativism.

Under Trump’s enforcement order, the citizenship of virtually each newborn would perchance travel nether the aforesaid scrutiny, oregon more, than what I conscionable applied supra to the Cruz family.

The genius of birthright citizenship is the simplicity of the 14th Amendment. It does not necessitate a heavy dive into genealogy oregon the parsing of intricate regulations. There is nary request to analyse parents’ oregon grandparents’ migration presumption oregon magnitude of residency, oregon to hunt for decades-old documentation. The lone applicable enquiry is spot of birth, which is capable to marque radical Americans.

I person 2 thoughts for Cruz. First, helium should beryllium cautious what helium wishes for. And successful lawsuit he’s forgotten, “E Pluribus Unum.”

Steven Lubet is the Williams Memorial Professor Emeritus astatine the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law.

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten, oregon redistributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, caput to The Hill.

Read Entire Article