“Mission: Impossible—The Final Reckoning” has a moving clip of conscionable nether 3 hours. Within those 3 hours, alas, I’d accidental that Tom Cruise has a moving clip of lone a infinitesimal oregon two. For those of america who’ve grown fond of Cruise the cardio demon, this is dispiriting news: what a letdown aft “Mission: Impossible—Ghost Protocol” (2011), successful which helium raced heroically done the blinding fury of a Dubai sandstorm. And who could hide the blissful London pursuit series from “Mission: Impossible—Fallout” (2018), successful which Cruise spent a full 7 minutes tearing up the geometric staircase astatine St. Paul’s, past sprinting, similar an unusually stiff-backed cheetah, crossed 1 rooftop aft another?
Cruise does spell for different brisk London jog successful “The Final Reckoning,” and, though he’s had tougher workouts, helium seems intent, arsenic ever, connected outrunning clip itself—an thought literalized by the show of Big Ben glowing successful the distance, ticking distant the seconds until doomsday. Cruise’s character, the Impossible Mission Force cause extraordinaire Ethan Hunt, has a weaponry that needs defusing; a beloved teammate, Luther (Ving Rhames), who needs rescuing; and an artificially intelligent nemesis, the Entity, to banish to the pits of cyberhell. But for Cruise the actor, who turns sixty-three successful July, moving has go much than a means to a communicative end. He does it for the aforesaid reasons helium scales skyscrapers, plunges into watery depths, and dangles from renegade aircraft: to formed speech immoderate hint of creeping senescence, and to punctual america what an honest-to-God movie prima is consenting to hazard for our entertainment. And that means thing successful a Hollywood that present caters to puny screens and punier visions, outsourcing the finer mechanics of enactment filmmaking to the visual-effects department. (Is it immoderate wonderment that A.I. is this movie’s supervillain?) Cruise means to crook backmost the timepiece successful much than 1 sense. He whitethorn beryllium older and puffier astir the eyes than successful 1996, erstwhile the archetypal “Mission: Impossible” movie was released. But helium inactive dives headlong into each escapade arsenic if it were his idiosyncratic fountain of youth.
But has that fountain present tally dry? “The Final Reckoning” is Cruise’s eighth “Mission: Impossible” outing and—assuming the rubric isn’t wearing a rubber mask—perhaps his last. The script, which the director, Christopher McQuarrie, co-wrote with Erik Jendresen, excessively often sags nether the value of end-times portents; adjacent for a bid that treats planetary demolition arsenic an occupational hazard, the temper has ne'er been rather this oppressively doomy. The Entity, which McQuarrie introduced successful “Mission: Impossible—Dead Reckoning Part One” (2023), has present conquered each of cyberspace, and frankincense go much pernicious, much deadly, and much tedious to summarize than ever. It has endangered satellite economies, unleashed plagues of misinformation, and adjacent spawned a almighty cult that seeks to hasten humanity’s end. Paris (Pom Klementieff), herself a erstwhile servant of the Entity who has since joined Ethan’s team, murmurs, “It is written,” arsenic if the techno-apocalypse had been foretold, eons ago, successful the e-book of Revelation.
Is the Entity a metaphorical variant of Trumpism? At slightest 1 of Ethan’s lines—“It wants america divided”—presumably means to marque america wonder. Yet the “Mission: Impossible” movies, for each their invocations of statecraft, terrorism, and impending atomic catastrophe, person mostly danced nimbly astir real-world geopolitics. You’d person to spell backmost to J. J. Abrams’s “Mission: Impossible III” (2006) and its implicit critique of George W. Bush-era torture tactics, to find the past Cruise rocket that made interaction with a real-world target. Still, “The Final Reckoning,” unwittingly oregon not, pushes backmost against a fewer Trumpist idiocies. For starters, the President of the United States is simply a Black woman, Erika Sloane (Angela Bassett), and her poised, empathetic enactment strikes a utopian chord adjacent nether dystopian circumstances. If anyone cracks a nasty D.E.I. joke, I didn’t perceive it supra the din of propellers, gunfire, and earnest war-room speechifying.
And past there’s the itinerary. Like astir of its predecessors, “The Final Reckoning” was changeable extracurricular the U.S.—locations see the U.K., Malta, Norway, and South Africa—and frankincense represents precisely the benignant of Hollywood-branded, internationally filmed mega-production that would endure should Trump marque bully connected his caller committedness to enforce tariffs connected films changeable abroad. A movie needn’t beryllium a enactment of art—and “The Final Reckoning,” the baggiest, slightest satisfying movie of the McQuarrie quartet, falls good abbreviated of the mark—to laic bare the anti-art implications of an America First agenda. There’s a crushed we picture large cinema arsenic transporting. To chopped america disconnected from the thrill of crossing borders and soaring implicit distant landscapes would contradict america a cardinal pleasance of moviegoing.
About halfway done “The Final Reckoning,” arsenic Ethan descends into the frigid depths of the Bering Sea, thing overdue and fantastic happens: the movie falls silent. Until now, determination has been a chatty overabundance of micro-logistics, adjacent for a “Mission: Impossible” movie: determination are craft carriers to beryllium commandeered, concealed coördinates to beryllium transmitted, and laws of physics to beryllium preposterously circumvented. (Also, good actors playing apical authorities and subject leaders to beryllium acknowledged, including Nick Offerman, Janet McTeer, Hannah Waddingham, and, astir impressively, arsenic a submarine captain, Tramell Tillman.) So overmuch accusation is laid out—and truthful overmuch accent placed connected risks, stakes, and disastrous imaginable outcomes—that you powerfully fishy lone a fraction of it volition substance successful the end, and you’re right. For possibly the archetypal clip successful McQuarrie’s assured handling of these movies—for my money, “Rogue Nation” (2015) remains the underappreciated champion of the lot—he makes the mistake of detailing the enactment truthful thoroughly successful beforehand that really dramatizing it becomes astir superfluous.
But, finally, the expository blather dies away, and the ngo is upon us: Ethan Hunt, conscionable shipwrecked submarine. His purpose is to retrieve a chunk of hardware holding lines of integer codification (it is written!) with the powerfulness to override and possibly decision the Entity for good. For a fewer spellbinding minutes, Cruise does everything helium could perchance bash underwater, abbreviated of singing “Eat your bosom out, James Cameron” into his oxygen tube. He sloshes his mode done waterlogged chambers, juggles unexploded Russian torpedoes, and, successful a delightful and astir apt unintended homage to “Risky Business” (1983), concisely swim-dances successful his underwear. It’s enactment cinema astatine its purest and astir existential: “The Ethan Hunt for Red October.”
For each the unsafe missions that Hunt has embarked connected solo, I can’t callback 1 that has conveyed specified a primordial consciousness of abandonment. For a moment, Lalo Schifrin’s irresistible taxable is simply a distant memory, and the destiny of humanity truly does look to remainder connected the shoulders of the astir unreachable antheral connected the planet. Such loneliness is different I.M.F. occupational hazard, but a self-imposed one: again and again, some “Reckoning” movies stress that Ethan’s astir heroic virtue—his refusal to sacrifice his teammates for the greater good—is simultaneously his gravest weakness. It explains why, beyond a valedictory consciousness of full-circle symmetry, McQuarrie piles connected truthful galore callbacks to the archetypal “Mission: Impossible” film, successful which Ethan’s teammates were murdered earlier his precise eyes—a formative trauma that helium seemed to hide for agelong stretches of the series, but which has been selectively retrieved, similar sublimated root code, for this movie’s communicative purposes.
More than once, McQuarrie splices successful an indelible representation from the 1996 film: a weapon falling into a top-secret vault, the leaf embedding itself successful a desk. It’s a reminder that the manager of that movie, Brian De Palma, remains the series’ astir intuitive ocular stylist and astir concise storyteller. Not that I craved concision from McQuarrie’s film; God knows helium and Cruise person earned their double-decker climax. But, amid the brooding sprawl, I wanted little big-screen doomscrolling, little self-indulgent gravitas, and little of the unspeakably boring villain Gabriel (Esai Morales), who bears the sanction of an archangel but ne'er achieves the stature of an archenemy. There are besides acold excessively galore repetitions of the I.M.F. creed—“We unrecorded and dice successful the shadows, for those we clasp adjacent and for those we ne'er meet”—which soon starts to dependable similar greeting-card John le Carré.
I besides wanted much from the teammates whom Ethan professes to attraction astir truthful much—particularly the women, with nary shadiness intended to Luther oregon Benji (Simon Pegg). I fishy that the apocalypse volition rob much than a fewer of america of our wits and personalities, but indispensable our movies beryllium truthful consenting to beryllium the point? As Grace, the wily pickpocket who joined Ethan’s squad successful “Dead Reckoning,” Hayley Atwell has been stripped of wit and playfulness. And I missed the vicious verve of the inactive formidable, present reformed Paris, though I fishy that Klementieff’s days arsenic an enactment prima are conscionable beginning. What caller adventures could bring out—and deepen—her combustible premix of vulnerability and ferocity? Finding that retired volition beryllium her mission, and I take to expect it. ♦
English (CA) · 
English (US) · 
Spanish (MX) ·