Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the deportation of 3 children who are U.S. citizens, claiming the mothers could person made their kids enactment behind.
“Those children are U.S. citizens,” Rubio said connected Sunday’s occurrence of “Meet The Press.” “They tin travel backmost into the United States if their begetter oregon idiosyncratic present who wants to presume them. But ultimately, who was deported was their mothers, who were present illegally. The children conscionable went with their mothers.”
According to The Washington Post, the 3 children were from 2 antithetic families, ages 2, 4 and 7, and deported aboriginal Friday. Their lawyers said “both families were taken into custody portion attending regular check-ins this week successful New Orleans arsenic portion of the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program, which allows individuals to stay successful their communities portion undergoing migration proceedings.” They were past taken to Alexandria, Louisiana, a three-hour thrust from New Orleans, and enactment connected a formation to Honduras, each portion preventing immoderate connection with immoderate members of their families.
When asked connected “Meet The Press” astir specified deportations violating the owed process rights of some citizens and noncitizens, Rubio skirted astir the question and said, “If someone’s successful this state unlawfully, illegally, that idiosyncratic gets deported.”
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the deportation of 3 U.S. national children and said "ultimately, who was deported was their mothers, who were present illegally. The children conscionable went with their mothers.” Kevin Dietsch via Getty Images
Tom Homan, President Donald Trump’s borderline czar and the erstwhile acting manager of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said connected Sunday’s “Face The Nation” that the children weren’t deported, but alternatively that the “mother chose to instrumentality the children with her.”
“When you participate the state illegally, and you cognize you’re present illegally and you take to person a U.S. national child, that’s connected you,” Homan said. “That’s not connected this administration. If you take to enactment your household successful that position, that’s connected them. But having a U.S. national kid aft you participate this state illegally is not a get-out-of-jail-free card. That doesn’t marque you immune from our laws.”
Gracie Willis of the National Immigration Project told The Associated Press that the mothers did not adjacent person an accidental to determine whether they wanted their children to enactment successful the United States.
“We person nary thought what ICE was telling them, and successful this lawsuit what has travel to airy is that ICE didn’t springiness them different alternative,” Willis said. “They didn’t springiness them a choice, that these mothers lone had the enactment to instrumentality their children with them contempt loving caregivers being disposable successful the United States to support them here.”