The Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (NYSEMKT:FSTA) and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (NYSEMKT:RSPS) some people U.S. user staples stocks, but their approaches pb to chiseled results.
This examination breaks down however their fees, returns, risk, liquidity, and holdings stack up for investors looking to entree this antiaircraft sector.
| Issuer | Invesco | Fidelity |
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.08% |
| 1-yr instrumentality (as of Feb. 3, 2026) | 7.01% | 8.34% |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 2.34% |
| AUM | $232 million | $1.3 billion |
| Beta (5Y monthly) | 0.52 | 0.55 |
Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500. The 1-yr instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months.
FSTA is considerably much affordable than RSPS, with an disbursal ratio of conscionable 0.08% versus 0.40%. In different words, investors tin expect to wage $8 per twelvemonth successful fees for each $10,000 invested successful FSTA compared to $40 per twelvemonth with RSPS. Also, portion the funds connection akin dividend yields, RSPS has a flimsy borderline implicit FSTA.
| Max drawdown (5 y) | -18.61% | -16.57% |
| Growth of $1,000 implicit 5 years | $1,067 | $1,385 |
FSTA holds 96 stocks and tracks mostly user antiaircraft names (98%), with insignificant allocations to user cyclical. Its apical positions are concentrated: Costco Wholesale, Walmart, and Procter & Gamble relationship for astir 37% of assets. The money is designed to reflector the broader user staples sector, but its largest holdings predominate wide exposure.
RSPS, by contrast, arsenic weights its 36 holdings from the S&P 500’s user staples sector. This offers a much balanced approach, arsenic each of its holdings marque up astir 3% of assets.
For much guidance connected ETF investing, cheque retired the afloat usher astatine this link.
FSTA and RSPS each instrumentality antithetic approaches to the user staples industry, and the close prime for your portfolio volition beryllium connected your investing preferences and hazard tolerance.
FSTA is dominated by ample brands, with household names accounting for a sizable stock of assets. This tin beryllium an vantage erstwhile those peculiar companies are thriving, but if they falter, it could deed this ETF harder.
RSPS, connected the different hand, is an equal-weight fund. While it holds acold less stocks than FSTA (just 36 compared to 96), each of those stocks makes up astir the aforesaid proportionality of the portfolio. This tin assistance trim volatility, arsenic each stocks are connected adjacent footing and little apt to sway the fund’s wide performance.
There isn’t needfully a wide victor betwixt the 2 ETFs, arsenic they connection unsocial angles that could entreaty to antithetic investors.

1 hour ago
2




English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·