Sarah Sidlow, The Motley Fool
Sun, January 25, 2026 astatine 11:00 AM CST 5 min read
-
SPDW charges a overmuch little disbursal ratio and presently offers a higher dividend output than ACWX.
-
SPDW covers lone developed markets extracurricular the United States, portion ACWX includes some developed and different non-U.S. equities.
-
Both funds person tracked intimately connected hazard and drawdown, but SPDW has delivered stronger five-year growth.
-
These 10 stocks could mint the adjacent question of millionaires ›
SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF (NYSEMKT:SPDW) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex US ETF (NASDAQ:ACWX) disagree meaningfully connected cost, marketplace coverage, and assemblage mix, with SPDW offering little fees and higher yield, portion ACWX brings broader non-U.S. equity vulnerability and a somewhat higher exertion allocation.
SPDW and ACWX are some ample planetary equity ETFs, but they instrumentality chiseled approaches. SPDW focuses connected developed markets extracurricular the United States, portion ACWX tracks a broader beingness of large- and mid-capitalization non-U.S. equities, making this examination applicable for investors weighing outgo against broader diversification.
| Issuer | SPDR | iShares |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.32% |
| 1-yr instrumentality (as of 1/9/2026) | 37.84% | 35.89% |
| Dividend yield | 3.3% | 2.83% |
| Beta | 1.03 | 1.02 |
| AUM | $33.45 billion | $7.87 billion |
Beta measures terms volatility comparative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year play returns. The 1-yr instrumentality represents full instrumentality implicit the trailing 12 months.
SPDW stands retired arsenic the much affordable option, with an disbursal ratio of conscionable 0.03% compared to 0.32% for ACWX. SPDW besides presently pays a higher dividend yield, which whitethorn entreaty to income-focused investors.
| Max drawdown (5 y) | -30.23% | -30.03% |
| Growth of $1,000 implicit 5 years | $1,304 | $1,251 |
ACWX holds 1,751 stocks and covers some developed and emerging non-U.S. markets, rebalancing vulnerability crossed fiscal services (25%), exertion (15%), and industrials (15%). Its apical holdings see Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (3.9%), ASML (1.53%), and Tencent Holdings (1.4%), with a money property of 17.8 years. This blend introduces further exertion and emerging marketplace vulnerability compared to developed-market-only funds, but whitethorn besides summation sensitivity to planetary marketplace shifts.
SPDW, by contrast, targets lone developed planetary markets, emphasizing fiscal services (23%), industrials (19%), and exertion (11%). Its largest positions are ASML (1.73%), Samsung (1.65%), and Roche (0.98%), resulting successful a somewhat much antiaircraft illustration and little vulnerability to emerging marketplace volatility. Both ETFs are wide successful scope, but SPDW’s absorption whitethorn suit investors seeking lower-cost entree to developed markets only.

1 week ago
9





English (CA) ·
English (US) ·
Spanish (MX) ·